Detailed analysis of the shock recommendations of a French parliamentary commission: banning social networking sites for under-15s and introducing a digital curfew for 15-18 year-olds, between health issues, European legal issues and consequences for industry players. influencer marketing.
The text examines parliamentary proposals aimed at restricting minors' access to online platforms, drawing on hearings and data gathered by the commission of inquiry. Each section offers practical analyses, concrete examples and application scenarios for parents, schools and influence professionals.
Banning under-15s from social networks: scientific and algorithmic assessment
The parliamentary commission has drawn up a severe report on the impact of platforms, in particular TikTok, on the mental health of minors. After six months of investigation and over 90 hours of hearings, the deputies note a scientific consensus on the deleterious effects of early and intensive exposure to recommendation algorithms. These mechanisms encourage the virality of problematic content and exploit the psychological fragility of adolescents.
Observed effects and concrete examples
Studies show a correlation between intensive use and sleep degradation, increased social comparison and a rise in eating disorders in certain populations. Eleven families took the platform to court after it recommended videos promoting suicide or self-mutilation. These cases illustrate a systemic mechanism: the algorithm reinforces risky behavior through a logic of commitment.
- Addiction: reinforcement of reward loops with short, frequent content.
- Sedentary lifestyle: accumulating screen time to the detriment of physical activity.
- Sleep deprivation: late consumption of content increases fatigue and cognitive problems.
The commission also points to the moral responsibility of influencers who sometimes take advantage of virality without warning of the risks. The hearings revealed partial or even evasive answers from platform representatives on moderation and the flaws in their system.
| Identified problem | Consequence observed | Illustration |
|---|---|---|
| Recommendation algorithm | Amplification of dangerous content | Legal cases for suicidal videos |
| Night exhibition | Sleep degradation | 10pm-8am curfew recommended |
| Lack of information | Parental difficulty in limiting use | Parental consent form |
In short, the central argument is that early access to networks encourages deleterious social dynamics and public health problems. Insight: controlling the age of access becomes a primary prevention measure.
Legal framework, European obstacles and regulatory options
French proposals, whether for a ban on under-15s or a digital curfew for 15-18 year-olds, come up against legal and European obstacles. Any national measure risks being challenged if it is not consistent with European Union rules. The commission therefore recommends maintaining pressure at EU level and considering a change in the status of platforms.
Legal options and practical issues
Several avenues are being explored: changing the legal status of platforms from hosts to publishers to increase their liability, imposing robust age verification and standardizing integrated parental control functions. Each option involves technical and constitutional challenges, notably proof of digital identity and respect for individual freedoms.
- Publisher status: strengthens moderation obligations but poses risks of censorship.
- Age verification: biometric techniques or parental certificates, privacy issues.
- EU harmonization: essential to avoid circumvention by offshore applications.
The commission also mentions the creation of an offence of digital negligence targeting certain parental behaviors, as well as the funding of studies to better document long-term effects. Politically, the recommendation to align with European initiatives such as the Commission President's proposals makes the approach more robust.
| Proposed measure | Benefits | Limitations |
|---|---|---|
| Prohibition | Strong preventive protection | Application and technical bypass |
| Curfew 22h-8h | Improved sleep | Difficult control and exemptions |
| Publisher status | Platform accountability | Legal risks and pressures on freedom of expression |
The key point is pragmatic: without European coordination and reliable technical tools, national measures will remain fragile. Insight: effective regulation requires joint technical, legal and educational solutions.
Consequences for influencers, parents, schools and the influencer market
A ban on networks for under-15s and the introduction of a curfew would have a direct impact on content strategies, marketing campaigns and creator responsibility. Agencies, brands and influencers will have to adapt to remain compliant and ethical.
Operational adaptations and best practices
For professionals, this will mean rethinking target audiences, integrating safety warnings and reinforcing the traceability of advertising practices aimed at minors. Schools and parents will have to adopt concrete measures, such as the generalized "cell phone on break" in schools, and training in media literacy.
- Influencers: content audit, risk training and contractual clauses to protect minors.
- Brands: audience segmentation and preference for channels that respect the new standards.
- Schools: digital education programs and implementation of digital breaks.
A case in point: a campaign for a clothing brand targeting 14-16 year-olds will have to revise its targeting if access is restricted to under-15s, and integrate broadcast windows that comply with the 10pm-8am curfew. Agencies will also have to negotiate compliance clauses with platforms and demand technical guarantees.
| Actor | Recommended action | Expected impact |
|---|---|---|
| Influencers | Training and warnings | Reducing legal risks |
| Brands | Modification of targeting | Maintaining advertising performance |
| Schools | Mandatory laptop break | Improved attention and well-being |
To illustrate, a fictitious agency, "Atelier Rouge", simulated a campaign in 2025 that complied with the new rules and found that it had less reach but better commitment qualitative survey of responsible parents and young people. Insight: regulatory constraints create opportunities for more responsible influencing practices.
FAQ
Why is the digital curfew proposed for 15-18 year-olds?
The digital curfew aims to reduce teenagers' night-time exposure. The aim is to limit screen time between 10pm and 8am in order to improve sleep, concentration and mental health, in line with the conclusions of the parliamentary report.
How does the ban on under-15s protect children?
The ban is designed to prevent early exposure to algorithms. Delaying access reduces the risk of addiction and exposure to dangerous content, according to the work presented by the commission.
What are the legal limits of the digital curfew in France?
Limits arise from the European framework and fundamental rights. All national measures must be compatible with EU law and respect proportionality, which requires coordination at European level.
How can platforms verify the age for the under-15 ban?
Several methods are being considered, including parental verification and technical authentication solutions. However, these approaches raise issues of privacy and technical feasibility.
Is the digital curfew effective against network addiction?
It can reduce risky behavior at night, but is not enough on its own. Digital curfews need to be combined with education, parental control tools and algorithm redesign to be fully effective.
What impact will the ban on under-15s have on influencers?
Influencers will have to adapt their content and contracts. Certain audiences will be less accessible, forcing finer segmentation and more responsible content.
Can France alone impose a ban on children under 15?
Only France risks legal and technical constraints. The report recommends coordinated action at European level to guarantee the effectiveness and sustainability of the measure.
What technical measures against dangerous content are proposed as part of the digital curfew?
Measures include diversification of recommendations and mandatory hourly controls. These mechanisms aim to limit the virality of harmful content during the night.
Why does the report refer to digital neglect?
The notion of digital neglect is intended to make parents and guardians more responsible. The report suggests creating a legal framework to combat the excessive exposure of the very young to screens.
How can schools contribute in the face of the digital curfew and the ban on under-15s?
Schools can generalize devices such as the "laptop on break" and integrate media education programs to reduce inappropriate use and raise awareness among students and parents.
ValueYourNetwork has been supporting brands and influencers since 2016 and offers proven expertise in influence marketing. With hundreds of successful campaigns on social networks, the agency knows how to adapt strategies to new regulatory and technical constraints. Working with ValueYourNetwork, advertisers benefit from an effective bridge between influencers and brands, reinforced compliance and creative formats that respect minors. Find out more and discuss a compliant, high-performance campaign, contact us.